Do we really have the right to disconnect?
Telework has become a permanent feature of working life in Europe. While we’ve seen the benefits of more flexible ways of working – particularly during the pandemic – the problems that arise from an increasingly connected life are also becoming clearer. Unfortunately, legislation alone may not be enough to ensure our right to disconnect.
Europe is at a pivotal moment – we are on the cusp of a world of work more flexible and agile than ever. Year on year, we’ve witnessed an increase in teleworking: +11% in 2019; +18% in 2020; +22% in 2021 (according to the EU Labour Force Survey).
The COVID-19 crisis has undoubtedly been an accelerator of change. Yet, despite an increase in people returning to offices as EU Member States slowly emerge from the pandemic, the reality is that telework is here to stay; Eurofound’s recent e-survey results show that teleworking numbers have stayed consistent (18% in 2021 and 2022) and that over 60% of people would prefer to work from home at least several times per month.
Publication: Fifth round of the Living, working and COVID-19 e-survey: Living in a new era of uncertainty
However, with this inexorable expansion of remote working options comes evidence to suggest that teleworking employees clock up more hours than office-only workers. What’s more, this increase is associated with employees working atypical or unsocial hours, often including unpaid overtime.
Connectivity without boundaries
This is not an entirely new phenomenon. Over the last 20 years, factors such as the advent of highly flexible ICT-based work practices have enabled more people to work anytime and anywhere and have fed a particular culture of working for longer and being available outside standard working hours. The pandemic-driven spike in teleworking has intensified this trend. As a result, more and more employees who work remotely are finding it difficult to disconnect and maintain the separation between work and home life.
The numbers speak for themselves. In Austria, almost half of teleworking employees in 2020 reported being available to respond to their employer at times when they would not otherwise be working. In Italy and Slovenia in 2021, one in four employees reported that they had been contacted daily outside working time on matters related to work. The subjective and cultural aspect of constant availability is captured by the finding last year that one-third of teleworkers in Greece reported being compelled by their employer to be available outside working hours, even if it was not necessary.
Clamping down on constant connectivity
It is widely recognised that being able to disconnect and maintain normal working hours contributes to employees’ well-being and performance, as well as the success of the companies they work for. In recognition of this, the ‘right to disconnect’ has emerged as a legal means of protecting employees’ right to switch off – literally and figuratively – at the end of a working day.
European Industrial Relations Dictionary: Right to disconnect
Belgium, France, Italy and Spain were the only countries to have passed specific legislation on the right to disconnect before the pandemic. But several countries have followed suit since the rapid growth of telework during the pandemic, including Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal and Slovakia. And Ireland has adopted a code of practice on the right to disconnect.
Although all these countries have incorporated the right to disconnect in legislation, differences exist in respect to content, coverage, requirements and ways of implementation. This variation arises from differences in industrial relations systems and adaptation to national practices at work.
Of the remaining Member States, some are currently debating the introduction of legislation, while others have preferred to leave the issue to be addressed at company level by the social partners or through company policy. For the Nordic countries – Denmark, Finland and Sweden – the right to disconnect is not on the political agenda. National research in these countries shows that the share of employees reporting problems related to working time is not higher than in other countries with legislation on the right to disconnect. This finding suggests that addressing the problems related to working time in telework arrangements is complex and might require different action depending on the context.
Forthcoming report: Regulations on telework in the EU
Are legal protections enough?
Having the right to disconnect in national legislation might not be sufficient to prevent the spread of an always-on work culture; evidence shows that even in countries that have a right to disconnect regulation, not all companies have adopted a policy related to this right.
In Spain in 2021, for example, only one in three employees reported that the right to disconnect is recognised in their company (via sectoral or company agreements or internal agreements or protocols).
Despite introducing relevant legislation as far back as 2017, 60% of teleworking employees in France still did not have a formal right to disconnect in 2021. Only half of employees had specific defined hours when they could be reached, while a similar proportion reported that they felt ‘overconnected’.
In Ireland, despite the code of practice coming into effect at the beginning of 2021, by the end of that year 14% of employees reported that their employer did not even acknowledge this right.
The fact that legislation alone has not yet managed to guarantee that all workers benefit from a right to disconnect might be due to some characteristics of the legislation [1] or because regulations need more time to be implemented at company level. One major factor, however, is the absence of a company culture that recognises employees’ right to disconnect.
This is not a technological problem: screens can be switched off, computers unplugged, phones put on flight mode. And, unfortunately, legislation cannot quickly change unhealthy habits. While it is essential to enshrine the right to disconnect in national legislation, collective agreements and company policies, without a ‘right to disconnect culture’, we may struggle to find the right work–life balance.
Image © rh2010/Adobe stock
Reference
^ Eurofound (2022, forthcoming), Regulations on telework in the EU, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Author
Oscar Vargas Llave
Senior research managerOscar Vargas Llave is a senior research manager in the Working Life unit at Eurofound and manages projects on changes in the world of work and the impact on working conditions and related policies: organisation of working time, remote work, the right to disconnect, health and well-being and ageing. Before joining Eurofound in December 2009, he worked as project coordinator in the field of health and safety and was responsible for the Professional Card Scheme for the Construction Sector in Spain at the non-profit Fundación Laboral de la Construcción in Madrid. He has a background in industrial sociology (Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca), and also holds a Diploma in Social Science Research Methods from the University of Cardiff and a Master’s degree in Health and Safety from the Autonomous University of Madrid.
Related content
9 September 2021
Right to disconnect: Exploring company practices
Digital technologies have made it possible for many workers to carry out their work at any time and anywhere, with consequent advantages and disadvantages. Eurofound data show that teleworkers are twice as likely to exceed the 48-hour working time limit, take insufficient rest and work in their free time, with knock-on effects on their physical and mental health. To address this issue, there have been calls for the ‘right to disconnect’. This report is based on case studies that chart the implementation and impact of the right to disconnect at workplace level. It builds on previous Eurofound research that shows an increase in collective agreements providing for a right to disconnect in countries that have enshrined this right in their legislation. With the exponential growth in teleworking brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of striking a better balance between the opportunities and the challenges associated with teleworking and ICT-based flexible working has become more relevant than ever before.
2 July 2020
Regulations to address work–life balance in digital flexible working arrangements
Developments in information and communication technology (ICT) have been among the key drivers of change in working life over the past two decades. Specifically, telework and ICT-based mobile work (TICTM) exemplifies how digital technology has led to more flexible workplace and working time practices. However, the ability to work anywhere and at any time can lead to greater work intensification, competition and work-on-demand. If this is not explicitly addressed, it threatens to override the advantages that ICT-based flexible working brings to work–life balance. As part of Eurofound’s extensive research into the impact of TICTM on working conditions and on work–life balance, this report aims to provide policymakers with ways to address new challenges in the world of work and to serve as a reference for future initiatives in relation to digitalisation, working time and work–life balance.
16 January 2020
Telework and ICT-based mobile work: Flexible working in the digital age
Advances in ICT have opened the door to new ways of organising work. We are shifting from a regular, bureaucratic and ‘factory-based’ working time pattern towards a more flexible model of work. Telework and ICT-based mobile work (TICTM) has emerged in this transition, giving workers and employers the ability to adapt the time and location of work to their needs. Despite the flexibility and higher level of worker autonomy inherent in TICTM, there are risks that this work arrangement leads to the deterioration of work–life balance, higher stress levels and failing worker health. This report analyses the employment and working conditions of workers with TICTM arrangements, focusing on how it affects their work–life balance, health, performance and job prospects. While policymakers in many EU countries are debating TICTM and its implications, the study finds that only a few have implemented new regulations to prevent TICTM from having a negative impact on the well-being of workers.
